At tonight’s Harvard Law School cocktail party, before Nicholas Negroponte arrived to give a talk about One Laptop Per Child, a friend asked me why I continue to attend Negroponte’s talks. “Given how many of these you’ve heard, what are you going to get out of this?”
The truth is, I learn something new every time Negroponte talks about the project. Even before he began talking, it was interesting to discover that he’s come equipped with almost a dozen “B2” prototype machines. They’re open and live on tables around the room, for people to play with – that’s a big improvement from the last time I played with the machine, when the machines were still being hand-built, were in scarce supply and you needed someone to walk you through the Sugar interface.
Negroponte starts by reminding us that OLPC is an education project, not a laptop project. He traces his work on the project to Seymour Papert and to the learning process students go through in learning Logo. Debugging, he argues, is as close as we can get to learning how to think… and it works for skills like spelling, as well as for programming.
Much of the focus of his presentation is on the failure of schools around the world. He makes it clear that the reason for OLPC is for low-income countries where schools may not have buildings or teachers, not just for middle-income countries. He talks about a Nigerian classroom where the XO laptop is being tested – enrollment in the first grade class has doubled, because students came out of the woodwork to get to use the machine.
Students enter schools in first grade with wide, curious eyes, Nicholas tells us. By fourth grade, they’re bored and no longer curious. “We’re inoculating against ignorance.” That’s why the project can’t be incremental – you have to inoculate whole countries, not just a school or a village.
The landscape has changed around the project, as Negroponte acknowledges. He takes a swipe at Intel’s Classmate project, pointing out that the machine has a 65w power supply, while the XO generally draws less than 2 watts. “If Libya gave every student a Classmate, they’d have to build new power plants.” Answering a question about whether the machine will run Windows – it will, and it wouldn’t be open if it didn’t, he argues – he points out that Windows now has a $3 edition, in part in reaction to the OLPC project. “We don’t have to be in the laptop business.” If other projects can put a laptop in every child’s hands, the project achieves its goal, even if the laptop is not the XO.
Despite the enthusiasm of countries like Rwanda, Libya and Uruguay, all of which are entertaining the idea of providing laptops to every schoolchild, no country has yet written a check to the project. That includes Argentina, Brazil, Nigeria, Pakistan, Palestine and Thailand as well, all of whom Negroponte lists as first-stage adopters of the project. It’s a big check to write – nations are being asked to invest in the laptop one million at a time. That’s $176 million for the machines alone, at current pricing, plus money for distribution and Internet provision – the actual price tag could be closer to a $200 – 250 million investment. As the project scales up, the price drops – possibly as low as $100 per unit in 2009, possibly to $50 per unit in the next decade. Quanta, which manufactures the machine, is ready to scale to a million laptops per month by year’s end. That doesn’t sound like much, Negroponte tells us, but global laptop production is only 5 million a month.
(In response to a question about whether laptops will be available in the US, Negroponte gives two answers. One is that there are some early discussions about making the laptop available in US schools. Also, it’s likely that end users will be able to purchase machines in a 1 for the price of 2 deal, where you can buy a machine, but subsidize one for students somewhere in the world. Negroponte makes it clear that OLPC won’t manage this project – they see it as too incremental – but they will allow it to happen and believe it will happen in the next 12 months.)
Negroponte’s talk was fairly light on specs – two major changes that I noticed in his slides. Because of the rising cost of nickel,
the machine is now using Lithin ion batteries instead. The decision to use nickel metal hydride was designed to allow batteries to be charged by human power as efficiently as possible – lithium batteries are more difficult to trickle charge.
Dr. Negroponte emailed to correct me: the new generation of machines will not be using Lithium Ion, but Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiPeFo4), a battery technology that is not yet in wide use, but has some characteristics which could be especially appropriate for the XO machine. Specifically, the batteries tend to deliver less heat than Lithium ion and are much more resistant to explosion if misused. It’s unclear whether they are easier to charge using human power than Lithium ion. Dr. Negroponte tells me that OLPC’s partners will be building a factory specifically to produce the LiPeFo4 batteries.
Flash memory costs have come down, however, and the machine currently features a gigabyte of flash RAM.
Negroponte closes with a story about the appearance of the machine, explaining why it’s green and white. The reason was Nigerian President Obasanjo’s enthusiastic embrace of the machine. After a cabinet meeting at Obasanjo’s villa, the President declared, “Professor Negroponte, I have one word for your project: enchanting.” Thrilled by the reception, Negroponte asked for the next prototype to be in the colors of the Nigerian flag – green and white.
It’s an enchanting project, and it’s more realistic every time I look at it. But it’s fair to be skeptical up until the moment a government signs that very big check.
I got to see one of these magical machines recently at Baycon. (A science fiction convention, to which Chris DiBono of Google brought his B2.) I can’t tell you how impressed I am. And I’m originally from Boston. My first reaction is generally to say, “Yes, but…” followed by a long string of criticism. (Okay, the keyboard does need some work, but I gather they’ve improved it for the B3 version.)
The Green Machine really is going to change the world, including the definition of what a laptop should be and how much it should cost in the developed world. I can totally understand those kids going to school just so they get to use the Machine. I’d register for first grade if it enabled me to use one!
Speaking of which, I keep wondering how its huge usefulness and cheapness is going to withstand the usual onslaught of corruption. What means does the OLPC group / governments plan to use to prevent these machines from being diverted to resale to, for instance, businesses? It would make a cheap and good video conferencing device. Or for smuggling back to the developed world? Given what a truly excellent and useful computer this is, I could see some real pressures on it. Is there something in place to prevent misuse?
Also, keep us posted, PLEASE, about where to sign up for the two-for-one sales. Hell, I’d be glad to buy three-for-one.
It’s hugely exciting to see technology like this dawning. Like the Wright Brothers’ first flight, or Sputnik, or that day I saw my first computer and realized I’d never have to use that despised and hated white-out again.
Pingback: One Laptop Per Child News
Now we have the whole presentation transcribed on OLPC Talks: http://www.olpctalks.com/nicholas_negroponte/negroponte_berkman_center.html
Here is his comments on battery types: “Nickel has tripled since we started this project. Literally, tripled cost per ton. So we are taking nickel out of it and we are leaving nickel and going to lithium ferrite just get back to a price. “
You can see how I might have mistaken Lithium Ferrite for Lithium Ion in that context, huh? :-)